Sports have long been held to be a unifying force, one which transcends cultural and national boundaries to bring people together in the spirit of competition and camaraderie. However, within the contemporary landscape, politicians increasingly exploit sports to further their agendas, which is a practice commonly referred to as "sportswashing." This manipulation not only undermines the integrity of sports but also serves to obscure pressing societal issues.
Sportswashing as a term entered the public lexicon in the mid to late 2010s. It is a practice through which sports events, teams, or personalities are used by political authorities to polish their reputations and regain the goodwill they had lost through malpractices and human rights violations. Political figures associate themselves with positive images of sports to get attention away from their controversies. This practice is common with political systems that are both authoritarian states and democratic governments, looking for an opportunity to get out of image rehabilitation from sports' international appeal.
The Qatar 2022 FIFA World Cup turned into a talking point of criticism because the event made light of the poor human rights record of the country. As Qatar had invested over $200 billion on infrastructures for this tournament, the limelight went towards the exploitation of the migrant workers who have constructed these stadiums and structures.
Reports from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch documented severe conditions, ranging from unsafe workplaces to unpaid wages and forced labour, during which thousands of workers were killed in the process of construction. Critics argue that Qatar's lavish spending for the tournament was done merely to divert attention away from these abuses, using them as a means of masking an image of modernity and global influence yet suppressing dissent and ignoring systemic inequality.
Saudi Arabian Grand Prix
Another bright example of sportswashing is the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, which first took place in 2021. This glittering Formula 1 spectacle was marketed as part of Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 initiative. Sharp criticism, however, was levelled at it by human rights organizations, saying it masked the country's continuous repression: its persecution of activists, suppression of free speech, and gender inequality. It is an event seen by many to attempt a focus diversion away from controversy, for example, that of murdering journalist Jamal Khashoggi.
Although the Grand Prix gave evidence of the ambition Saudi Arabia has for integration into the global sporting community, the underlying reality, however disturbing it may be, remained buried beneath the spectacle and luxury of the event.
The confluence of politics and sport is not new. Games such as the Olympics have always been stages for expressions of politics and propaganda, even in history. For example, the 1936 Berlin Olympics were used by the Nazi regime to depict a non-violent and modern Germany, which veiled the oppressive policies of the regime. In recent years, the 2008 Beijing Olympics were criticized based on China's human rights record; critics argued that the games were used as a smokescreen to distract from problems at home. The Role of Athletes in Political Agendas Athletes themselves become entangled in the middle of the political exploitation process.
They sometimes end up becoming involuntary symbols of a cause of politics, while in other situations, they find themselves at the forefront of protest events against societal ills.
Over time, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has tried to make the Games an apolitical activity. However, in truth, global conflicts and social movements permeate the sports scene. For example, the upcoming Paris 2024 Olympics are anticipated to be politically charged due to ongoing conflicts, with activists calling for boycotts and sanctions. Implications and Ethical Considerations The exploitation of sports by political figures raises significant ethical concerns. It challenges the autonomy of sports organizations and athletes, often placing them in positions where they must navigate complex political landscapes.
It also alienates some of the fans who view sport as an escape to seek refuge from political discourse.
Selectivity in the actions of a particular organization, such as the IOC, in actioning political expressions complicates the narrative and brings accusations of double standards, which undermine sports as impartial platforms. Conclusion While sports have the profound power to unite and inspire, their manipulation by political figures for image enhancement and agenda promotion threatens their integrity. Acknowledging and critically examining cases of sportswashing is important to preserve the sanctity of sports and make sure they remain a space of fair play and genuine human connection free from the distortions of political exploitation.
Let us know your thoughts in the comments below. If you have burning thoughts or opinions to express, please feel free to reach out to us at larra@globalindiannetwork.com.
